Editorial Guidelines

Our standards for creating accurate, trustworthy health content

PainQuestions.net is committed to providing accurate, evidence-based health information. These editorial guidelines outline the standards and practices we follow to ensure our content meets the highest quality standards.

Content Standards

Accuracy

  • All medical claims must be supported by cited sources from reputable medical literature
  • Statistical data must come from primary research or official health organizations
  • Treatment information must reflect current medical guidelines
  • When evidence is limited or conflicting, this is clearly stated

Objectivity

  • Content presents balanced information without bias toward specific treatments or products
  • Multiple treatment options are discussed when clinically appropriate
  • Limitations and potential risks are included alongside benefits
  • Commercial influences do not affect editorial content

Completeness

  • Articles address the full scope of a topic, including causes, symptoms, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention
  • Emergency warning signs are clearly highlighted when applicable
  • Information about when to seek medical care is always included
  • Frequently asked questions are addressed

Writing Standards

Readability

  • Content is written at approximately an 8th-grade reading level
  • Medical terminology is defined when first used
  • Complex concepts are explained in plain language
  • Sentences and paragraphs are kept concise

Structure

  • Articles use clear headings and subheadings for easy navigation
  • Key information is presented early in each section
  • Bullet points and tables are used for easy scanning
  • A summary or "bottom line" section provides quick takeaways

Citation Standards

Citation Requirements

  • Each article includes 15-30 citations from authoritative sources
  • Citations use superscript numbers linking to a references section
  • Primary sources (peer-reviewed research) are prioritized
  • Sources from the past 3 years are preferred when available

Acceptable Sources

  • Peer-reviewed medical journals
  • Government health agencies (CDC, NIH, FDA, WHO)
  • Academic medical institutions
  • Professional medical associations
  • Established medical references (MedlinePlus, Merck Manual)

Sources We Avoid

  • Non-peer-reviewed publications
  • Sources with obvious commercial bias
  • Personal blogs or anecdotal accounts as primary sources
  • Outdated research (unless historically relevant)

Medical Disclaimer Requirements

Every article must include:

  • A clear medical disclaimer stating content is informational, not medical advice
  • Encouragement to consult healthcare providers for personal medical decisions
  • Emergency contact information when discussing serious symptoms
  • Publication and last-updated dates

Content Prohibitions

We do not publish content that:

  • Makes unsubstantiated claims about cures or treatments
  • Provides specific dosage recommendations without citing official guidelines
  • Encourages self-diagnosis or self-treatment for serious conditions
  • Promotes unproven alternative treatments as substitutes for evidence-based care
  • Contains sensationalized or fear-based language

Update Policy

  • Content is reviewed periodically to ensure accuracy
  • Articles are updated when significant new research or guideline changes occur
  • Last-updated date is clearly displayed on all articles
  • Major revisions are noted when applicable

Corrections Policy

We are committed to correcting errors promptly:

  • Factual errors are corrected immediately upon discovery
  • Significant corrections are noted at the top of affected articles
  • Readers can report concerns via our Contact page