PainQuestions.net is committed to providing accurate, evidence-based health information. These editorial guidelines outline the standards and practices we follow to ensure our content meets the highest quality standards.
Content Standards
Accuracy
- All medical claims must be supported by cited sources from reputable medical literature
- Statistical data must come from primary research or official health organizations
- Treatment information must reflect current medical guidelines
- When evidence is limited or conflicting, this is clearly stated
Objectivity
- Content presents balanced information without bias toward specific treatments or products
- Multiple treatment options are discussed when clinically appropriate
- Limitations and potential risks are included alongside benefits
- Commercial influences do not affect editorial content
Completeness
- Articles address the full scope of a topic, including causes, symptoms, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention
- Emergency warning signs are clearly highlighted when applicable
- Information about when to seek medical care is always included
- Frequently asked questions are addressed
Writing Standards
Readability
- Content is written at approximately an 8th-grade reading level
- Medical terminology is defined when first used
- Complex concepts are explained in plain language
- Sentences and paragraphs are kept concise
Structure
- Articles use clear headings and subheadings for easy navigation
- Key information is presented early in each section
- Bullet points and tables are used for easy scanning
- A summary or "bottom line" section provides quick takeaways
Citation Standards
Citation Requirements
- Each article includes 15-30 citations from authoritative sources
- Citations use superscript numbers linking to a references section
- Primary sources (peer-reviewed research) are prioritized
- Sources from the past 3 years are preferred when available
Acceptable Sources
- Peer-reviewed medical journals
- Government health agencies (CDC, NIH, FDA, WHO)
- Academic medical institutions
- Professional medical associations
- Established medical references (MedlinePlus, Merck Manual)
Sources We Avoid
- Non-peer-reviewed publications
- Sources with obvious commercial bias
- Personal blogs or anecdotal accounts as primary sources
- Outdated research (unless historically relevant)
Medical Disclaimer Requirements
Every article must include:
- A clear medical disclaimer stating content is informational, not medical advice
- Encouragement to consult healthcare providers for personal medical decisions
- Emergency contact information when discussing serious symptoms
- Publication and last-updated dates
Content Prohibitions
We do not publish content that:
- Makes unsubstantiated claims about cures or treatments
- Provides specific dosage recommendations without citing official guidelines
- Encourages self-diagnosis or self-treatment for serious conditions
- Promotes unproven alternative treatments as substitutes for evidence-based care
- Contains sensationalized or fear-based language
Update Policy
- Content is reviewed periodically to ensure accuracy
- Articles are updated when significant new research or guideline changes occur
- Last-updated date is clearly displayed on all articles
- Major revisions are noted when applicable
Corrections Policy
We are committed to correcting errors promptly:
- Factual errors are corrected immediately upon discovery
- Significant corrections are noted at the top of affected articles
- Readers can report concerns via our Contact page